Title
Publisher
Date
Language
Identifier
Transcription
Chicago Ills
June 6th 1861
His Excellency
Gov Yates
My Dr Sir:
I trust you will not think me impertinent, in addressing you this note, upon the subject herein contained. In these times it may be well, that we all make suggestions, which shall be expressive of our desires.
I am most decidedly opposed to the policy of the "Tribune" of this city, in intimating that you, as the Chief Executive of this State, should appoint as the successor of the lamented Douglass, some one of his political friends - I am very sorry to see Republican journals especi
ally those of influence & power in the State, & in the party pursue any such cause. The party is not responsible for the acts of Providence, nor do I think that because of His interposition Douglass has been removed, that therefore it follows that there is any moral or political obligation resting upon you, to fill his place with one of his political friends or followers, more especially, with such a man as the Hon J C Allen, your late competitor - The Senator, I think should be from the northern portion of the State, for reasons, that will at once suggest themselves to you, & if so who is the best man. Wentworth, Ogden and others are mentioned, but are they the best men?
Let me suggest for your careful reflection (& I do
it without consultation or suggestion from anyone) the name of LS Church of McHenry. He is a new man, one not offensive to the Democratic party, a good & true man an honest man, of good mind, habits and high moral standing - Is he not a good man, and would he not fill the position with honor & credit to the State?
I make this suggestion with all candor & in all earnestness. - It strikes me most favorably. I hope it may you. Pray Sir, consider it. And may high wisdom & true patriotism govern you in your deliberations upon this important question.
With true sentiments of
regard, I remain Your Devoted
Friend R W Smith
Hon R. W. Smith
as to Douglas successor