Bill of complaint in Coffin et al. v. City of Springfield

http://www.alplm-cdi.com/chroniclingillinois/files/uploads/300237.pdf

Title

Bill of complaint in Coffin et al. v. City of Springfield

Description

William H. Herndon writes the bill of complaint for the plaintiff in the case of Robert Coffin et al vs City of Springfield. He signs it Lincoln & Herndon.

Creator

Herndon, William H.

Publisher

Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum

Date

1853-10-27

Format

pdf

Language

en

Identifier

300237
T1853.10.27-MISC

Transcription

To the Honorable the Judge of the Circuit Court

of Sangamon County In Chancery Sitting

Nov. Term AD 1853

Your Orators Robert Cofflin, William Farnsworth and

Simeon Francis citizens of Springfield and of Sangamon

County and of the State of Illinois would most respectfully

represent unto your Honor that the Town of Springfield

was laid off by Elijah Iles and that part of it in

particular called and known as Old Town plat and

which was properly acknowledged by said Iles and duly

named in the [Recorders?] Office Sangamon County and

State of Illinois in Book [blank] page [blank]

and a copy of which said plat will be filed and

marked (A) and prayed to be taken as part of this

bill and your orators show that by said plat there

is a street called Sixth Street being Eighty feet wide

by virtue of which said plat, acknowledgment and rec

ording the street and the public grounds therein specified

became was and is in the town now City of Springfield

and that by virtue of the law said town or city hold the

legal title in said grounds for and as public highways

for the citizens of said Town now City and as public highw

ays for the citizens of said County and State aforesaid "and

"the land intended to be for streets alleys ways commons

"& public uses in any Town or City or addition thereto shall

"be held in the Corporate name thereof in trust to and for

"the uses and purposes set forth and intended or expressed"

And your orators would show that by virtue of said plat

survey acknowldgement and recording the same and

the marking Sixth Street thereon that Sixth Street was int

ended and expressed to be for a public highway for all

the citizens as well City, Town County and State and that

the same should remain open, free and unobstructed for

ever for the purpose of affording free passage way,

egrefs and regrefs for the Citizens aforesaid. And these

your orators make this complaint as all these rights

of Citizens of the City of Springfield, Citizens of Sangamon County and State

of Illinois and in which rights and capacities this bill is filed


Your Orators or one of your Orators would show that he

at one time promised verbally and not in writing or by deed

that if said Town now city of Springfield would build

erect and establish keep and maintain a good market

house in or about the Centre of said Sixth Street running

north and south along street and between [blank]

Street and [blank] Street and would also and likewise

keep erect and maintain a good quiet and respectable

town Hall, Mayors office and the other necessary civil

offices of said Town & City costing in all about fifteen

thousand Dollars and all of which should be erected

kept and maintained at the said point, place and

Street that your orator S. Francis would give [blank]

feet off the west side of his two lots lying on said

point place and said Street - P. C. Latham did the

same and as your orator is informed so did Joseph

Klein - said Latham is now deceased. And in further

ance of said verbal contract the said City as was

supposed accepted said proposition and entered the

same upon the records of the City but the same has

not been done in full and as was as supposed

a complete record kept of what the City was to do

but the same is and was not done, yet enough remains

on the records of said City to show that the said Town

did not do execute or perform their part of the Contr

act gift or dedication or rather did not perform the

condition precedent to a complete gift or dedication

Your orators therefore pray for a complete certified

record of the proceedings of said Town or City under seal

properly verified &C and a copy of which will

in due time be filed and marked (B) and is prayed

to be taken as part of this bill.

Your Orators would therefore

show that some time in the year AD 1837 or 1839

or about that time the said Town or City did erect a

kind of market house worth say five or six hundred

dollars and a poor shabby affair at that. Your


Orator S. Francis did in performance of the original under

standing throw off or give the said [blank] feet off the

west side of his lots and which was done and opened

or thrown off before the erection of the present nasty and

filthy meat shop and said Francis has never once

agreed or consented to this contemptible and wrongful

deviation from the original understanding and dedi

cation - that said market house is at the proper place

point and street as per understanding. Your orator

would further show that at no time was it the underst

anding between the donators as aforesaid that a common

public calaboose Sugar House & hog pen should be

erected in or near said point. Your orators show that

sometime in the year AD 1850 the said City of Sprin

gfield did erect, make and does now maintain in and

upon said street, place and point a city calaboose

Sugar House and a place or nucleus around which

filth and stench gather in dark clouds and in comp

any with which are the wild howls of the idiot, lunatic,

and inebriate nightly making noise and "confusion worse

confounded" Your orator S. Francis charges that

he has never dedicated any of his ground legally - he ch

arges that said Town or said City has not performed

its contract, nor has it accepted the dedication or

complied with the conditions upon which the verbal

gift aforesaid was to have been made, but has wholy

violated the same. And all your orators, said

Cofflin, Farnsworth and Francis charge that the

said market house is an obstruction to them and each

in their travel along over and upon the street aforesaid and

an obstruction to their view along [or?] up and down

said street - that they live upon said street - that said

market House and Calaboose is a hindrance and obstru

ction to their rights and businefses as citizens of said

City of Springfield - Citizens of Sangamon County and

as Citizens of the state of Illinois.

And your Orators further


charge that said market house is a nuisance, that

it is [illegible] to health and comfort and impares

health life and comfort and that it makes them and

their full and free enjoyment lefs commodious and dang

erous and lefs comfortable than they ought and would be

were it not for said erections &C.

Wherefore your orators pray that

said market house, calaboose and appurtinances be

declared a nuisance and a prepesture and that a writ

issue from this Honorable Court ordering said City and

Citizens to abate and wholy remove and demolish the

same or so much as will be proper So as to leave the street free, commodious, unimpeded,

free from nuisance, prepesture &C and wholy to them

Said Street open as it was accustomed to be and

that the same as former remain and for such further

order, decrees, writs and relief as is, may or shall

become necessary in the premises and as to your

Honor shall seem most just and proper in the

premises

In tender consideration consideration of

which premises your orators pray that the City of

Springfield may be made defendant to this bill

of complaint and that the Peoples writ of subpoena

issue for said Corporation defendant and that

it answer this your orators bill of complaint

according to law and the uses of this Honorable

Court and upon a final hearing your orators

now and will at all times pray &C

Lincoln & Herndon

Sol. for Complainants


262

Robt. Cofflin et al

[?] Bill

City of Springfield

Filed Oct 27 1853

J A Matheny Clerk

Status

Needs Review

Percent Needs Review

100

Weight

200

Original Format

paper and ink
5 p
36 x 22 cm

Document Viewer